Guide

YouTube ShortsLong-formEarnings Comparison

YouTube Shorts vs Long-Form Videos: Which Earns More? (2026)

Should you focus on YouTube Shorts or long-form videos for maximum earnings? The answer isn't straightforward — each format has distinct advantages. This guide compares both formats across RPM, total revenue, growth speed, and effort, with real numbers to help you decide.

Last updated: February 25, 2026

Step-by-Step Guide

1

Start with Shorts

Spend your first 1-3 months focused on Shorts to build an audience and reach monetization quickly.

2

Identify winning topics

Analyze your Shorts performance to find which topics resonate most with your audience.

3

Create long-form from top Shorts

Turn your best-performing Short topics into detailed long-form videos. The audience interest is already validated.

4

Build the hybrid workflow

Establish a routine of 1 long-form + daily Shorts. Use AI tools to maintain Shorts output while focusing creative energy on long-form.

5

Optimize for total revenue

Track revenue from both formats monthly. Adjust your content mix based on what generates the highest total earnings.

RPM comparison: Shorts vs long-form

The per-view earnings difference between Shorts and long-form is dramatic:

Long-form video RPM (India):
- Average: ₹40-₹150 per 1000 views
- Top niches (finance): ₹200-₹400 per 1000 views
- Low niches (entertainment): ₹15-₹50 per 1000 views

Shorts RPM (India):
- Average: ₹8-₹25 per 1000 views
- Top niches (finance): ₹25-₹50 per 1000 views
- Low niches (entertainment): ₹3-₹10 per 1000 views

Long-form earns 5-10x more per view. This is because:
- Long-form videos show multiple ads (pre-roll, mid-roll) per view
- Shorts ads are shared across the entire Shorts feed, diluting revenue
- Long-form viewers are more engaged, making ads more valuable
- YouTube takes 55% of Shorts ad revenue vs 45% of long-form revenue

However, RPM alone doesn't tell the full story. You need to factor in views, production effort, and growth potential.

Total revenue comparison with real scenarios

Let's compare identical effort levels across both formats:

Scenario: 20 hours/week of content creation

Shorts-focused (producing 14 Shorts/week):
- Average views per Short: 30,000
- Weekly views: 420,000
- Monthly views: 1.68 million
- Monthly RPM: ₹15/1000
- Monthly ad revenue: ₹25,200

Long-form focused (producing 2 videos/week):
- Average views per video: 15,000
- Weekly views: 30,000
- Monthly views: 120,000
- Monthly RPM: ₹80/1000
- Monthly ad revenue: ₹9,600

Hybrid approach (1 long-form + 7 Shorts/week):
- Shorts: 210,000 views/month at ₹15 RPM = ₹3,150
- Long-form: 60,000 views/month at ₹80 RPM = ₹4,800
- Monthly ad revenue: ₹7,950 plus faster subscriber growth

Surprise result: Shorts-focused actually earns more in total despite lower RPM, because the view volume is massively higher. But the hybrid approach grows your channel fastest for long-term earnings.

Growth speed comparison

Beyond immediate earnings, growth speed affects long-term income:

Shorts growth advantages:
- 10-100x more impressions per video than long-form
- Faster subscriber acquisition (critical for hitting 1,000 threshold)
- Lower production barrier — more videos = more algorithm lottery tickets
- Perfect for testing topics before investing in long-form

Long-form growth advantages:
- Better audience retention and loyalty
- Search traffic compounds over time (evergreen content)
- Higher watch time per viewer (builds relationship)
- Better for brand deals (brands value engaged audiences over raw views)

Growth timeline comparison:
| Metric | Shorts-only | Long-form only | Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to 1K subscribers | 1-3 months | 6-12 months | 2-4 months |
| Time to 10K subscribers | 4-8 months | 12-24 months | 6-12 months |
| Monthly views at 6 months | 2-5M | 100-500K | 1-3M |
| Brand deal readiness | 6-12 months | 3-6 months | 4-8 months |

Shorts win for raw growth speed. Long-form wins for building a sustainable brand. The hybrid approach gives you the best of both worlds.

The optimal strategy: Shorts-to-long-form funnel

The most successful YouTube creators in 2026 use this proven funnel:

Phase 1 (Months 1-3): Shorts Blitz
- Post 2-3 Shorts daily in your niche
- Goal: Reach 1,000 subscribers and build initial audience
- Use FluxNote to produce Shorts rapidly — enter a topic, get a complete video with voiceover and subtitles
- Track which topics get the most views and engagement

Phase 2 (Months 3-6): Hybrid Content
- Continue 1-2 Shorts daily for growth
- Add 1-2 long-form videos per week on your best-performing topics
- Long-form videos convert Shorts viewers into loyal subscribers
- Start monetization once eligible

Phase 3 (Months 6+): Revenue Optimization
- Long-form becomes your primary revenue source (higher RPM)
- Shorts serve as promotion for long-form content
- Start diversifying with brand deals, affiliates, and memberships
- Use Shorts to stay relevant in the algorithm while long-form builds wealth

Real example: A finance education channel following this strategy typically reaches ₹50,000-₹1,00,000/month within 12 months, compared to ₹15,000-₹30,000/month with Shorts-only.

Pro Tips

  • Shorts RPM is 5-10x lower than long-form, but Shorts views are 10-100x higher
  • Use your highest-performing Shorts as proof-of-concept before investing in long-form
  • Long-form videos with mid-roll ads earn significantly more — always enable them for videos over 8 minutes
  • The hybrid approach typically maximizes total revenue within 6-12 months
  • Brand deals value long-form engagement more than Shorts views — build both for maximum sponsorship rates

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to create your first viral video?

Join thousands of creators automating their content. Start free — no credit card required.

🔒 No credit card required
2-minute setup
🎯 Cancel anytime